Observation 20970: Polyporus squamosus (Huds.) Fr.
When: 2009-05-10
Collection location: St. Genis, France [Click for map]
No herbarium specimen

Notes: Found on some random small hardwood, I don’t really know the names of trees out here yet.

Proposed Names

57% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
It’s small
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2009-05-13 18:34:06 CEST (+0200)

Normally they are 15-20 cm, but I’ve seen the double size too.
This is 20 cm, recently found in the southern of Sweden:

If this is small…
By: Douglas Smith (douglas)
2009-05-13 15:26:31 CEST (+0200)

This is small? I don’t know I must be spending too much time with lbm’s, 4-6 cm seems rather large to me. Plus this one was rather beat up. I just wanted any photo from Europe on this species in the system, since it is supposedly a common spring species around here.

That small..
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2009-05-13 12:53:29 CEST (+0200)

Then I beleive the pore size is within the range for squamosus too, so I can’t argue against it :-)

Really, ya got me…
By: Douglas Smith (douglas)
2009-05-13 10:14:12 CEST (+0200)

I’m not really the biggest Polypore type of guy, and esp. these guys which don’t appear in California, either rarely or not at all. This one was on a tree, about 3 feet of the ground on the side of the trunk. It was 4-6 cm in diameter there. I’ve never seen P. tuberaster, and I’ve only seen P. squamosus a few times, so I could believe that I can’t tell them apart.

What’s the size of this one?
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2009-05-13 09:08:11 CEST (+0200)

Unless the pictures are extreme closeups, I would have called this Polyporus tuberaster. The pores look way too large for squamosus.

Created: 2009-05-12 19:43:28 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2012-01-16 16:05:54 CET (+0100)
Viewed: 76 times, last viewed: 2016-10-25 20:51:06 CEST (+0200)
Show Log