Notes: I have another puzzle to solve and any help will be appreciated. I found a group of specimens growing on a cherry tree. They all may belong to the same genus – Physcia, but the last two can belong to another genus, a possibility being Pyxine. They are chronologically ordered and will be considered in subsequent observations. I also include a comparative set of photos with all the specimens. Unfortunately I didn’t took any sample (except for the one in _observation 209970) or made any spot test, maybe because in the field they all look (wrongly) familiar.
|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||0.00||0|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
My doubts started with 209970, which is much more wrinkly and has more convex lobes than the usual specimens of either P. aipolia or P. stellaris. Continuing with 209971, which as you say looks like _Physconia, but that I was unable to recognize. At the end, for me 209972 look very much like Pyxine and not Physconia, though specimens in either genera have more flat or slightly concave lobes. Note, however, that in this location Physconia are very abundant and I never found here any Pyxine sp..
Thanks, Jason, for the comment.
I personally find that I frequently guess the genus wrong(!) in the field, especially in arid habitats. I am frequently surprised to find spot tests turning out “wrong” when I put the specimens under the scope. Embarrassing, but I’m sure I’m not alone.
Created: 2015-07-14 16:42:36 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2015-07-14 17:10:37 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 24 times, last viewed: 2016-10-26 03:22:08 CEST (+0200)