|I’d Call It That||3.0||0.00||0|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
If my interpretation of the “verified by” initials are correct, the identification was confirmed by Rick Van de Poll (RVP).
are usually made without microscopy and with few habitat details. I have added the photo with part of the collection slip which states that it was on wood but not what kind. I am not sure who made the identification.
Do you know if the authors associated a photo with the species? Or could you post the original description? Unless everything growing from Populus spp. = T. subchartaceum I don’t see how this can be distinguished/identified reliably (unless it requires microscopy or DNA)
This was a foray field ID. Might not be correct.
What defines this species? growth on a Populus sp. and large size? It doesn’t look abnormal to most Trichaptum spp… ME also says slow to develop teeth but so many Trichaptum spp. look poroid well into age
Created: 2015-08-04 19:57:59 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2015-08-05 08:39:12 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 62 times, last viewed: 2016-09-10 16:49:12 CDT (-0400)