Observation 213483: Placynthium nigrum (Hudson) Gray

Proposed Names

-28% (2)
Recognized by sight
32% (3)
Recognized by sight
84% (3)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
Uf … what a relief!
By: zaca
2016-02-09 13:11:15 AEDT (+1100)
ID P.nigrum confirmed by Jim Bennett
By: Andrew Khitsun (Andrew)
2016-02-09 12:58:46 AEDT (+1100)
Then P. nigrum for sure.
By: zaca
2015-08-23 02:47:07 AEST (+1000)
Well in WIsconsin we’re supposed to have three species:
By: Andrew Khitsun (Andrew)
2015-08-22 12:24:52 AEST (+1000)

P.nigrum, P.stenophyllum and P.asperellum (P.aspratile)

By: zaca
2015-08-22 11:24:43 AEST (+1000)

If it was here I would call it P. nigrum, but i don’t know what are the N. A. species. That was my only reserve.

If it’s Placynthium it’s got to be P.nigrum.
By: Andrew Khitsun (Andrew)
2015-08-22 10:15:21 AEST (+1000)

There are only three species listed in Thomson, and Bennett didn’t add any more either, so there aren’t that many choices. I wasn’t even sure it was Placynthium since other observations I have of that genus differ from this one. Perhaps, I was fooled because this one is wet and lush, but other observations were collected in dry places. But if Placynthium, prothallus is usually typical for P.nigrum.

Created: 2015-08-22 09:18:00 AEST (+1000)
Last modified: 2016-01-18 10:28:24 AEDT (+1100)
Viewed: 53 times, last viewed: 2017-02-20 05:13:59 AEDT (+1100)
Show Log