Observation 213526: Agaricales sensu lato
When: 2015-08-14
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

51% (3)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight
30% (2)
Recognized by sight
28% (1)
Recognized by sight
33% (2)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
I dunno Alan…
By: Dave W (Dave W)
2015-08-25 00:30:33 ADT (-0300)

To my eye the gills on the left side of the photo are clearly adnexed/notched and not free of the stipe. On the right side, the gills appear to be free, but given the other condition, I’d say this is likely the result of these gills (on the right) seceding.

I zoomed the gill photo
By: Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
2015-08-25 00:19:47 ADT (-0300)

Gills are still free.

Zoom the gill photo…
By: Dave W (Dave W)
2015-08-23 21:50:14 ADT (-0300)

and you will see clear attachment in the upper left. Other gills appear to have broken free of attachment… a not uncommon phenomenon.

the gills werent cleanly free
By: Matt Welter (mattfungus)
2015-08-23 12:36:00 ADT (-0300)

In other words at first glance they appeared free but upon closer inspection they were still slightly attached. Somewhere between free and attached. It was like they went from being 2mm to just .5mm right before the stem

By: Timoteo (Timoteo)
2015-08-23 11:46:52 ADT (-0300)

I agree with Alan that this looks like a Pluteus sp., but I can’t tell if the gills are free in that 2nd pic, it almost looks like the gills have pulled away from the stem in age.

The gills look attached to me…
By: Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
2015-08-23 11:13:15 ADT (-0300)

Which is why I didn’t suggest Pluteus/Volvariella…

It was only 1" in diameter if that helps
By: Matt Welter (mattfungus)
2015-08-23 10:39:39 ADT (-0300)

Created: 2015-08-21 22:53:05 ADT (-0300)
Last modified: 2015-08-24 17:49:52 ADT (-0300)
Viewed: 99 times, last viewed: 2016-10-24 08:16:15 ADT (-0300)
Show Log