Observation 217639: Hypholoma fasciculare (Huds.) P. Kumm.
When: 2015-10-03
No herbarium specimen

Notes: Bright yellow clusters on sodden, well rotted log

Proposed Names

53% (3)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight: Too early to tell.
21% (3)
Recognized by sight
53% (6)
Recognized by sight: Spore print will tell if they’re Hypholoma or Pholiota.
21% (3)
Recognized by sight
35% (4)
Recognized by sight: Bright yellow with hint of green, clusters, growing on wood. Can tell if it’s H. fasciculare or H. capnoides without seeing the gills. These look young, but water logged.

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
I did not get to see these mature – slugs probably.
By: Martin Livezey (MLivezey)
2015-10-04 19:15:59 CDT (-0500)

I few days later there were some new ones at the bottom of the same log. The gills looked unmistakably to be H. fasiculare. I brought them home to see if they were fluorescent under UV light, but alas, my UV light was hiding. But I am convinced they are H. fasiculare anyway.

The partial veil for P. alnicola…
By: Dave W (Dave W)
2015-10-04 10:20:45 CDT (-0500)

is fleeting. Specimens showing virtually no evidence of the veil are typical. Usually, a given cluster includes a few unexpanded caps where the veil is seen. But I would not rule out the possibility that no veil is observable for an entire fruiting.

Hypholoma vs. Pholiota
By: Nathan Wilson (nathan)
2015-10-04 05:42:04 CDT (-0500)

Pholiota is an interesting idea. Spore color would tell us immediately, but I would expect a bit more of veil for Pholoiota and the cap color and shape look more like Hypholoma to me. For example, observation 161662 and observation 82558.

Created: 2015-10-03 18:48:37 CDT (-0500)
Last modified: 2016-01-20 19:55:03 CST (-0600)
Viewed: 118 times, last viewed: 2016-11-01 19:38:09 CDT (-0500)
Show Log