Observation 21816: Russula Pers.
When: 2009-06-06
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

57% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
aff. rosacea
By: Steve Axford (steveaxford)
2009-06-08 09:50:00 CEST (+0200)

If it was in Australia I’d suggest Russula aff. rosacea, but it’s not.

Gustatory sensation
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2009-06-08 06:53:21 CEST (+0200)

It’s not about the “taste” so much as acrid vs. non-acrid. Another possibly useful distinction is immediately vs. latently acrid.

did not tast these
By: Dan Molter (shroomydan)
2009-06-08 03:35:55 CEST (+0200)

I tasted every Russula I found a few years ago, but no longer engage in the practice. I don’t think I would describe any of them as tasting pleasant. Some taste quite bad, and others are just blah.

I’ve heard that all non-bitter red Russulas are edible, but I don’t think anybody even knows how to distinguish species with in this group.

Taste? Spore print?
By: Johannes Harnisch (Johann Harnisch)
2009-06-08 02:59:30 CEST (+0200)

Created: 2009-06-07 17:53:06 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2010-12-09 20:53:55 CET (+0100)
Viewed: 50 times, last viewed: 2016-08-30 04:19:06 CEST (+0200)
Show Log