Observation 22715: Agaricales sensu lato
When: 2009-06-28
No herbarium specimen

Notes: Some more little brown guys. They look a bit like Hygrocybe.

Proposed Names

-17% (4)
Recognized by sight
1% (2)
Eye3
Recognized by sight
23% (3)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight
55% (1)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
AGARICALES UNDERW. IS A TRUE TAXON. THIS OBS SEEM IDENTIFIABLE
By: GALL Alain (GALLA-TAHITI)
2016-06-04 23:47:18 CEST (+0200)

SEE THE OTHERS WITH ONE CLIC.
http://mushroomobserver.org/comment/comment_search?pattern=AGARICALES+UNDERW.+IS+A+TRUE+TAXON.+THIS+OBS+SEEM+IDENTIFIABLE.
Agaricales sensu lato AS BEEN CREATED BY MYXOMOP.
SEE HIS COMMENT ON. http://mushroomobserver.org/name/show_name/31029?q=2mGEk
ACTUALLY.
Agaricales sensu lato 3781 OBS = 252 pages
BUT
Agaricales Underw. 1 OBS = LESS THAN 1 pages
CHANGE THIS SYSTEM FOR AMELIORATE MO.
HELP US FOR IDENTIFICATION.

I agree
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2011-05-17 03:27:02 CEST (+0200)

with Irene – looks like Rhodocybe/Clitopilus nitellina/us

Just a thought
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2009-07-02 08:18:27 CEST (+0200)

The gill edge is probably sterile. This is a long shot, but maybe you can find dispersed spores down the stem..?

I don’t think they are brown-spored. Seem to be white-spored close to Gymnopus.
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2009-07-01 23:28:43 CEST (+0200)
These guys…
By: AmatoxinApocalypse (AmatoxinApocalypse)
2009-07-01 23:02:07 CEST (+0200)

I find these or something very similar to these in the colder months here in the south.

I’m just as interested as to finding out what these are as you are Dan.

Yeah, hard to say…
By: Douglas Smith (douglas)
2009-07-01 22:53:22 CEST (+0200)

It might be white spored. When they look like they might be white spored like this, I like to make sure I see some spores attached to some basidia before I assume what the spores really look like. Without that, probably can’t go very far with these. They might be too young, and don’t have any spores, I’ve got a growing list of maybe interesting things I’ve come across that fall in that category.

small round clear spores maybe
By: Dan Molter (shroomydan)
2009-07-01 19:53:36 CEST (+0200)

This one is frustrating for sure. With a gill edge mounted in water under the scope I could see a few tiny roundish clear cells floating in the water, but the entire lamella appears to be composed of similar tiny spherical cells. What I’m seeing might not even be spores. I could not get a decent photo of them. Looks like this mushroom will remain a mystery until I find a specimen willing to drop spores.

specimen failed to drop spores
By: Dan Molter (shroomydan)
2009-07-01 15:23:54 CEST (+0200)

I’ll put a gill edge under the scope today to see what I can see. _

Did you get a spore print on these
By: Douglas Smith (douglas)
2009-07-01 14:57:46 CEST (+0200)

These are kinda neat, at least it is a good photo of them, and they look like good material. They look like they are in that unknown little brown job region where you need a spore print to get started really.

.
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2009-07-01 12:11:38 CEST (+0200)

Reminds of Rhodocybe nitellina – except for the rough cap structure.

Created: 2009-07-01 00:17:05 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2016-06-06 05:26:29 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 181 times, last viewed: 2016-10-24 04:00:16 CEST (+0200)
Show Log