Observation 231: Lycoperdon marginatum Vittad.
When: 1992-08-15
No herbarium specimen

Notes: The date is only accurate to the month.

Originally identified as L. nettyana based on the very brief description in Mushrooms Demystified. However, according to Scott Bates there is some question of the validity of this name.

Images

276
Loaded from Lycoperdon/marginatum/1992-08-slide-1.jpg.
The date is only accurate to the month.

Proposed Names

-14% (2)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
a case of identity
By: Dennis Oliver
2010-10-14 19:01:33 CDT (-0400)

Yes, There is some question about L. nettyana. The Ramsey’s description is really close to L. lambinonii (Nordic Macromycetes) which was described by Demoulin in 1972, eight years before Ramseys publication. If you check British puffballs, they describe it as intermediate between L. umbrinum and L. molle.
At least in the west most people do not have a good concept of any of these species, mixing umbrinum with nigrescens, etc. and rarely using lambinonii, umbrinum or another species that Demoulin says is in the Pacific Northwest, L. ericaeum.

As to your fungus…. Lycoperdon marginatum is better name than any i’ve mentioned so far. I like it.

Created: 2006-05-21 03:24:04 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2010-10-14 20:14:22 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 359 times, last viewed: 2016-11-06 20:29:30 CST (-0500)
Show Log