Observation 23159: Mycena (Pers.) Roussel
When: 2009-05-24
Herbarium specimen reported

Notes: LBM growing in wood chips… caps up to 1cm across, stipe base bruising blue,
no odor.

[admin – Sat Aug 14 02:03:18 +0000 2010]: Changed location name from ‘Mt. Tomah Botanic Gardens, Blue Mountains, NSW, Australia’ to ‘Mount Tomah Botanic Gardens, Blue Mountains, New South Wales, Australia’

Proposed Names

57% (1)
Recognized by sight
83% (1)
Recognized by sight: probably an endemic OZ species…beautifully blueing and unique. Too bad we can’t stroll thru the Aussie mycena book online! Anybody have contact info for the author?

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
By: Noah Siegel (Noah)
2009-07-17 22:44:33 CDT (-0400)

I can find no record of Mycena subcaerulea or M. amicta occurring in Australia or New Zealand, no surprise there…

This looks the to be same as Inski’s collection from Auckland, NZ.

I don’t have the Grgurinovich book on mycena of SE Aussie (I couldn’t bring myself to spend a $130 dollars on a book that i wouldn’t use very often) If anybody does have it see if it mentions anything about blue staining mycenas.

This one should be left to Mrs.Grgurinovich
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2009-07-14 16:53:02 CDT (-0400)

cos she is studying Mycena in Australia and has named many new species. I think it is neither nor.

Mycena subcaerulea
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2009-07-14 09:43:42 CDT (-0400)

is an american species, first described by Peck:

Mycena amicta (Fr.) Quél. was originally described from Europe.

They can easily be told apart by the spore shape though, almost globose in subcaerulea, dacryoid in amicta

Oh, wait, M. subcaerulea is ok for N. America.
By: Douglas Smith (douglas)
2009-07-14 09:16:56 CDT (-0400)

I remembered wrong it seem, M. subcaerulea is well known in N. America, there is another blue based Mycena that is only known in Europe, what was that name?

What I bearly remember…
By: Douglas Smith (douglas)
2009-07-14 04:54:26 CDT (-0400)

I think that M. subcaerulea is actually a European species, that has only been assumed in N. America, or something like that. There were some notes about this in the Smith monograph on Mycena, but then again that was from 1945. Dr. Perry might have an opinion on this, or maybe Dimi, I think he has looked at European Mycena compared to California. I’ve left Mycena studies to others… I think there was a clear difference microscopically, but when they are older and brown it is hard to tell macroscopically.

And of course any of this probably doesn’t matter for a obs. from the antipodes…

By: Erin Page Blanchard (CureCat)
2009-07-14 03:59:49 CDT (-0400)

Hmm, well M. subcaerulea is a North American species as well. I wonder if it or M. amicta are actually found in Australia or if this species is something distinct. Both species look like good matches, I’m not sure how you would definitively distinguish them macroscopically.

By: Douglas Smith (douglas)
2009-07-14 00:42:21 CDT (-0400)

If this were North America, you would want to call these Mycena amicta. Not sure if that holds up down under.

Created: 2009-07-13 23:49:22 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2011-03-14 13:51:36 CST (-0500)
Viewed: 175 times, last viewed: 2016-10-22 21:20:24 CDT (-0400)
Show Log