Observation 24148: Tetrapyrgos nigripes (Schwein.) E. Horak
When: 2009-08-08
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

5% (3)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
frequent misidentification
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2010-01-20 02:56:59 CET (+0100)

Quoted from http://www.mycologia.org/cgi/content/full/97/3/667:

“…herbarium-deposited North American material of M. candidus often have been misdetermined as Tetrapyrgos nigripes (Desjardin pers obs). We reserve judgment on whether Marasmiellus sect. Candidi belongs to a redefined Tetrapyrgos or represents a distinct lineage until further species of the group are added to the analyses.”

It looks as though the differentiation between M. candidus and T. nigripes is a matter of some pretty specific microscopy. Anyone know of any surefire macroscopic characteristics which distinguish the two?

EDIT: was going to add this comment to all M. candidus and T. nigripes, but I thought that might be a bit annoying.

Created: 2009-08-09 15:33:16 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2009-08-09 15:33:16 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 96 times, last viewed: 2016-10-23 21:22:03 CEST (+0200)
Show Log