Observation 24591: Amanita Pers.
When: 2009-08-16
No herbarium specimen

Notes: This ugly Amanita looks like it might belong in the caesarea group, but I’m not sure.

Proposed Names

57% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight
29% (1)
Recognized by sight
45% (2)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
The banningiana
By: Dave W (Dave W)
2009-10-07 18:30:37 BST (+0100)

I’ve found here in NE PA shows variable yellow tints on the gills and/or stipe. Sometimes the gills are quite pale.

A. banningiana..
By: Erlon (Herbert Baker)
2009-10-07 14:27:04 BST (+0100)
..has a yellowish stipe and gills, perhaps it is Amanita arkansana.

I see a slight annulus..

second to Dave’s comment
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2009-08-25 00:35:18 BST (+0100)

I second Dave’s comment regarding absence of a ring.


The one non Caesar
By: Dave in NE PA
2009-08-21 05:55:01 BST (+0100)

aspect is the lack of a ring on the stalk. Maybe one got washed off or otherwise fell off? With a ring on the stalk, I’d call this one A. banningiana. If this type is truly ringless, then it likely belongs in Vaginatae.

Created: 2009-08-21 05:38:41 BST (+0100)
Last modified: 2009-08-21 05:39:05 BST (+0100)
Viewed: 65 times, last viewed: 2016-10-23 21:42:06 BST (+0100)
Show Log