|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||0.00||0|
|Could Be||1.0||6.72||1||(Alan Rockefeller)|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
looks like there’s a subgleba, and it also looks big for a “pusilla” (it means “very small”), but Bovista pusilla has been interpreted in many different ways (no type collection, and a vague original description).
The rhizomorph looks very thick, could it still be Lycoperdon pyriforme?
From the subglebal portions visible in this photo, it certainly does not look like a Bovista.
Created: 2009-10-07 20:46:18 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2011-07-05 15:15:45 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 375 times, last viewed: 2016-10-26 12:56:45 CEST (+0200)