|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||0.00||0|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
appear to be R. roseolus. However, I don’t believe the first photo is the same species, possibly not even the same genus, although related. Could be a Macowanites, but would need to see a specimen sliced through the center.
Created: 2009-10-30 01:33:04 GMT (+0000)
Last modified: 2010-12-09 19:53:57 GMT (+0000)
Viewed: 23 times, last viewed: 2016-10-27 12:00:53 BST (+0100)