|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||0.00||0|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
appear to be R. roseolus. However, I don’t believe the first photo is the same species, possibly not even the same genus, although related. Could be a Macowanites, but would need to see a specimen sliced through the center.
Created: 2009-10-29 18:33:04 PDT (-0700)
Last modified: 2010-12-09 11:53:57 PST (-0800)
Viewed: 25 times, last viewed: 2017-06-06 02:43:57 PDT (-0700)