Observation 3801: Agaricales sensu lato
When: 2003-02-19
No herbarium specimen

Notes: A very small, black mushroom. The sand grains are also very small. All of the photos showing the gills were taken through the lens of a dissecting microscope.

Proposed Names

-14% (2)
Recognized by sight
2% (2)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight
-31% (2)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
AGARICALES UNDERW. IS A TRUE TAXON. THIS OBS SEEM IDENTIFIABLE
By: GALL Alain (GALLA-TAHITI)
2016-06-04 17:24:07 CDT (-0400)

SEE THE OTHERS WITH ONE CLIC.
http://mushroomobserver.org/comment/comment_search?pattern=AGARICALES+UNDERW.+IS+A+TRUE+TAXON.+THIS+OBS+SEEM+IDENTIFIABLE.
Agaricales sensu lato AS BEEN CREATED BY MYXOMOP.
SEE HIS COMMENT ON. http://mushroomobserver.org/name/show_name/31029?q=2mGEk
ACTUALLY.
Agaricales sensu lato 3781 OBS = 252 pages
BUT
Agaricales Underw. 1 OBS = LESS THAN 1 pages
CHANGE THIS SYSTEM FOR AMELIORATE MO.
HELP US FOR IDENTIFICATION.

I wonder
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2011-05-14 14:32:18 CDT (-0400)

with that sparse, veinlike hymenium, vaguely Omphalinoid shape, and dark colors, what about one of the smaller, darker Arrhenia – do you know anything about where it was collected?

Something like this
http://tinyurl.com/3lwyd7p

Gone
By: Darvin DeShazer (darv)
2011-05-14 11:38:02 CDT (-0400)

It was brought into my lab by one of my students. She eventually dropped it on the floor and lost it. It was very, very small.

I want to know more…this thing is really cool.
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2011-05-14 00:21:36 CDT (-0400)

have you been back to this site since? Is there an herbarium specimen?

Created: 2007-07-23 19:19:28 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2016-06-04 18:36:48 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 137 times, last viewed: 2016-09-27 18:22:42 CDT (-0400)
Show Log