Observation 45164: Australopilus palumanus (Wolfe & Bougher) Halling & Fechner
When: 2010-03-25
Herbarium specimen reported

Notes: Wolfe & Bougher use the presence or absence of a raised reticulum to distinguish 2 groups of taxa in Tylopilus subgen. Roseoscabra (the T. chromapes group). While such a distinction might have been artificially useful at the time, it is not clear if the feature is really diagnostic – I have seen T. chromapes with and without a reticulum in the same gaggle of basidiomes.
Tylopilus queenslandianus would possess pseudocystidia, and T. palumanus would not.
Herbarium specimens in BRI & NY (REH9275).

[admin – Sat Aug 14 01:58:05 +0000 2010]: Changed location name from ‘Australia, Queensland, Fraser Island, road from Central Station to Lake Birrabeen.’ to ‘Road from Central Station to Lake Birrabeen, Fraser Island, Queensland, Australia’

Proposed Names

56% (1)
Recognized by sight: Pinkish pileus, chrome yellow stipe base, pinkish scabers confined to a fine reticulum
Used references: Wolfe, C.B. & Bougher, N.L. 1993. Australian Systematic Botany 6: 187-213.
Based on microscopic features: Pseudocystidia are absent.
84% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Used references: Halling et al. 2012. Affinities of the Boletus chromapes group to Royoungia and the description of two new genera, Harrya and Australopilus. Austral. Syst. Bot. 25: 418-431.

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
thanks to you!
By: Davide Puddu (Davide Puddu)
2015-04-21 05:26:31 CST (+0800)

i’m very far away and none of the said genera are found here .i’m just trying to understand.thanks for introducing me to this new Genus

Thanks Davide
By: Roy Halling (royh)
2015-04-21 05:10:10 CST (+0800)

if you look here: http://redgum.nybg.org/boletineae/chromapes.php, you can see how the molecular phylogenetics supports recognition of Australopilus.

is this…
By: Davide Puddu (Davide Puddu)
2015-04-21 01:02:59 CST (+0800)

an Harrya?i mean can this be considered in that genus?

Created: 2010-05-06 04:18:25 CST (+0800)
Last modified: 2014-03-30 05:54:56 CST (+0800)
Viewed: 157 times, last viewed: 2016-10-26 02:46:40 CST (+0800)
Show Log