Notes: These were growing on woody debris in the woods.
The spores were in the right range for either Peziza arvernensis or Peziza repanda but since they did not appear to be really significantly roughened and P. arvernensis does not appear on the SFSU Spring list, it’s most likely P. repanda.
|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||0.00||0|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
Created: 2010-05-25 11:16:48 CST (-0600)
Last modified: 2013-12-03 12:25:14 CST (-0600)
Viewed: 33 times, last viewed: 2016-10-26 13:44:50 CST (-0600)