Observation 47290: Phaeomarasmius Scherff.
When: 2010-06-21
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

-11% (3)
Recognized by sight: just a guess…
48% (2)
Recognized by sight
-23% (3)
Recognized by sight: another possibility

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
By: Erin Page Blanchard (CureCat)
2010-06-25 01:22:57 UTC (+0000)

*EDIT: Proposed names were removed, so this comment is a bit irrelevant now…

P. muricata and P. erinaceella are both currently in Flammulaster (F. muricatus and F. erinaceellus).

I do not think that this is a Flammulaster because those species are supposed to have an epithelium, meaning that the pileipellis consists of rounded cells, hence a more granular cap surface, which this does not have. Phaeomarasmius is very similar looking, but has a trichoderm, a shaggier or more tufted appearance due to the hyphae that stick out from the pileipellis. This kind of looks like that.. But not any species that I am familiar with. I wouldn’t rule out Pholiota either.

By: Erin Page Blanchard (CureCat)
2010-06-24 23:51:02 UTC (+0000)

This is the same as observation 47455.

Created: 2010-06-21 22:44:12 UTC (+0000)
Last modified: 2010-06-26 07:57:32 UTC (+0000)
Viewed: 116 times, last viewed: 2016-10-21 10:01:22 UTC (+0000)
Show Log