Observation 47926: Cladonia squamosa (Scop.) Hoffm.
When: 2010-05-16
No herbarium specimen

Notes: This had Chris Parrish and I stumped in the field. I think it is C. caespiticia because of the tiny, completely decorticate podetia, and highly dissected squamules. It’s just weird to see it so three-dimensional, almost like it’s a weird C. squamosa. This was growing on several extremely rotten logs and stumps deep in the valley beside the Caldwell Fork. Normally I see C. caespiticia on exposed, sunny soil banks. I will collect a piece and send it to James Lendemer next time I’m in the area.

[admin – Sat Aug 14 01:59:00 +0000 2010]: Changed location name from ‘Caldwell Fork Trail, Cataloochee Cove, Waynesville, Haywood CO., North Carolina, USA’ to ‘Caldwell Fork Trail, Cataloochee Cove, Waynesville, North Carolina, USA

Proposed Names

46% (2)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight: In C. caespiticia, the squamules are never up the podetia like that, and the podetia are generally very short. The statement that it may be a weird C. squamosa seems to be correct. [Photo confirmed by James Lendemer.]
Nice photos!

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
you’re right, not caespiticia
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2010-07-28 23:34:24 BDT (+0600)

On fresh re-examination of my (blurry!) photos, I see a number of corticate podetia, so I’m forced to agree that it’s not Cladonia caespiticia. Still strikes me as very odd for C. squamosa. If this were the only population I saw, I’d leave it at that, but we found it with the same habit in quite a number of scattered locations. And we did see some “normal” squamosa… wait, no, we saw normal furcata, sorry. Ah, clearly need to go back. :) Thanks for catching this.

Created: 2010-07-02 02:32:21 BDT (+0600)
Last modified: 2010-09-05 02:21:32 BDT (+0600)
Viewed: 53 times, last viewed: 2016-10-24 13:26:23 BDT (+0600)
Show Log