Observation 49521: Amanita subcokeri Tulloss nom. prov.
When: 2010-08-02
No herbarium specimen

Notes:

[admin – Sat Aug 14 01:58:00 +0000 2010]: Changed location name from ‘Asheville NC’ to ‘Asheville, North Carolina, USA

Proposed Names

-57% (1)
Recognized by sight
71% (3)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight: a number of characters

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
I’m saving the book for my eighties…
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2011-04-05 20:26:03 EDT (-0400)

You’re welcome, Patrick.

I’ve got to get the website looking like I want it first.

I’ll put the book on my list for what to do in my eighties. (Don’t know whether that should get a smiley face for a frowny face.)

I’ll look forward to what you may send my way. We’re particularly interested in filling in distribution information for states and counties for which we have no material listed. [Sometimes that’s because we haven’t added the data to the site; but sometimes it’s because there’s no data we know of that we can add.]

We’re still working through the herbarium here, but have well over 4,200 collections cited now on www.amanitaceae.org (this includes hundreds of collections from the literature, especially types and other original material). Today, we exceeded 620 collections for which we have lat./long. data. It’s pretty obvious from the maps we’re generating now, that we are short on lat./long data for much of the world; but, from the insider’s view, I can tell you that we simply lack data for the central states and provinces of the North American continent.

Very best,

Rod

Thank you very much!
By: Patrick Harvey (pg_harvey)
2011-04-05 17:56:52 EDT (-0400)

Glad to be helpful in your studies. I’ll be looking for more Amanita this year. Didn’t happen to see any A. citrina this fall, lilac or otherwise.

By the way, have you contemplated publishing a guide to Amanita — book, rather than online?

It checks out.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2011-04-05 17:15:42 EDT (-0400)

The specimen’s macroscopic characters and spores confirm that it is A. subcokeri and not A. cokeri. Thank you again for sending the specimen. It will be listed in the material examined for A. subcokeri on www.amanitaceae.org with a link to this observation.

Very best,

Rod

Specimen was received
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2011-04-04 18:08:12 EDT (-0400)

Specimen was received, Patrick.

And I was grateful that you sent it. I’ll check it out.

Rod

Specimen sent
By: Patrick Harvey (pg_harvey)
2010-08-09 14:35:29 EDT (-0400)

Rod — Specimen has been sent.

Did not notice smell
By: Patrick Harvey (pg_harvey)
2010-08-03 11:40:58 EDT (-0400)

I did not notice much of a smell — wasn’t strong like the Lepidellas
or anything. I still have it, about half dried out, I’ll get it into
the dryer tonight.

Created: 2010-08-02 21:43:24 EDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2011-04-05 18:14:01 EDT (-0400)
Viewed: 370 times, last viewed: 2016-11-25 22:45:34 EST (-0500)
Show Log