Observation 50183: Tricholoma (Fr.) Staude
When: 2010-07-17
No herbarium specimen
0 Sequences

Species Lists


Copyright © 2010 Christian F. Schwarz
Copyright © 2010 Christian F. Schwarz
Copyright © 2010 Christian F. Schwarz

Proposed Names

28% (1)
Used references: Darvin suggested this ID
47% (2)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight: Didn’t see all three pictures the first time. Gill attachment looks like Tricholoma.

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2010-10-04 13:38:20 EDT (-0400)

I unwrapped the foil packet and couldn’t find any deposit to speak of.
Sorry, all. I was really looking forward to seeing these spores.

When you get a chance to look at the spores,…
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2010-08-15 16:04:25 EDT (-0400)

please let me know what you find.

Very best,


Spores and dimensions
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2010-08-15 15:15:32 EDT (-0400)

I won’t have a chance to look at the spores for another month or so, but my notes have the largest cap at 80 mm across, odor farinaceous, no distinct KOH reaction (dull brownish at most)

Have you had a chance to look at the spores?
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2010-08-15 15:00:32 EDT (-0400)

At least one could see if they were in the ball park of Limacella spores. Do you remember an approximate cap diameter, stem length, or stem width?

Very best,


Yes, unfortunately.
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2010-08-15 12:28:40 EDT (-0400)

I did manage to bring back a spore print, however.

Is the “no herbarium specimen” characterization correct?
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2010-08-15 11:25:59 EDT (-0400)

Is it correct that there is no specimen of this?


Created: 2010-08-11 23:35:13 EDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2014-04-23 17:12:11 EDT (-0400)
Viewed: 86 times, last viewed: 2017-05-10 23:22:35 EDT (-0400)
Show Log