Observation 51721: Suillus brevipes (Peck) Kuntze
When: 2010-08-27
Herbarium specimen reported

Proposed Names

-14% (2)
Recognized by sight: large, irregular bright yellow pores, no annulus, no glandular dots.
Used references: all of them. zip.
68% (5)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight
-4% (2)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
sequence confirms
By: Nhu Nguyen (xerantheum)
2016-04-27 14:35:34 PDT (-0700)

This fits nicely in the S. brevipes clade.

Suillus volcanalis is probably not a real species
By: Tom Bruns (pogon)
2011-05-01 07:48:03 PDT (-0700)

We’ve sequenced two Thiers collections of volcanalis, including the type, and its identical to S. pseudobrevipes, but this specimens I’d call brevipes

so near and yet…
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2010-08-31 20:17:00 PDT (-0700)

the perfect fresh example of this species that I have been saving has disappeared from my fridge (I suspect the Brownies or perhaps poltergeists). All that I have left is dessicata. Can I still do the various chemical tests on that?

It would be totally cool if this was volcanalis, and it does have some of that mushroom’s features (esp. where Thiers mentions that it is similar to brevipes)
but I will need some hard convincing before I go with that almost-never-seen suillus.

well
By: Noah Siegel (Noah)
2010-08-31 14:54:57 PDT (-0700)

what you call brevipes in the west is a different species anyway…

an intriguing suggestion, Darv…
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2010-08-31 08:46:52 PDT (-0700)

I will try and scope it today.

Eastern colleagues, this is NOT a brevipes!!!

it resembles brevipes…
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2010-08-30 18:07:23 PDT (-0700)

but the pore color shape and size are wrong.

Created: 2010-08-30 17:51:22 PDT (-0700)
Last modified: 2016-04-27 14:35:08 PDT (-0700)
Viewed: 187 times, last viewed: 2016-05-06 19:31:01 PDT (-0700)
Show Log