Observation 51836: Amanita amerimuscaria Tulloss & Geml nom. prov.
When: 2010-09-01
(45.811019° -77.136748° )
No herbarium specimen

Notes: Zone 02 also had some Amanita amerimuscaria, but not in the sector of its periphery where I’ve seen them before. Instead, three immature specimens of about equal ages were growing in the interior of the Zone under mixed trees, in the pine-dominated half (not, interestingly, the aspen-dominated half).

Proposed Names

-5% (2)
Recognized by sight
Used references: At this time this is the name Rod recommends we use for the eastern taxon.

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Pardon?
By: Erlon (Herbert Baker)
2011-03-19 15:05:56 CST (-0500)

Maybe you should ask yourself why Rod isn’t including any species from the east in his description of A. amerimuscaria. Furthermore, Amanita muscaria var. guessowii this is the name he recommends to use for now for the eastern taxon. I suggest you learn some manners, Noah. Spend less time insulting people and more time studying. lol

No
By: Noah Siegel (Noah)
2011-03-19 14:34:44 CST (-0500)

just the pseudotaxonomists…

What the hell?
By: Paul Derbyshire (Twizzler)
2011-03-19 14:16:46 CST (-0500)

Don’t tell me — the taxonomists gone on another redecorating binge?

Created: 2010-09-01 21:58:03 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2011-03-19 14:15:25 CST (-0500)
Viewed: 97 times, last viewed: 2016-09-29 21:36:27 CDT (-0400)
Show Log