Observation 51862: Pholiota (Fr.) P. Kumm.
When: 2010-08-09
Herbarium specimen reported

Proposed Names

57% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight: note pale yellow stipe apex. i don’t know the species…

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Fungi of brittain (jordan)
By: damon brunette (damonbrunette)
2010-09-02 11:38:29 CDT (-0400)

has a P. gummosa that is close. Im looking at the stem mostly for this one

unless its a photo of bisporella…
By: damon brunette (damonbrunette)
2010-09-02 11:29:07 CDT (-0400)
Well…
By: Douglas Smith (douglas)
2010-09-02 11:20:06 CDT (-0400)

The photos here are only 0.7 megapixel, is the Nikon Coolpic a sub-megapixel camera? You can put full-res here, the site scales the photos for you. Even if there is a reason for not full res, 0.7 meg. is kinda small… It is hard to see things like gill attachment and veils at this low res.

But I’m just a pixel whore really, I’ll always want more…

ah Doug, I have spoiled you with all of those pixels…
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2010-09-02 10:20:28 CDT (-0400)

no, I did NOT take my SLR into the woods with me. I made that mistake in the SE last year, in a dripping damp woods, and it cost me big-time. I used my little Nikon Coolpix for all of the in situ shots, but had the SLR back at the lodge just in case. It rained a bit just about every day. No time to set up a tripod, either…too many damn wonderful things to capture!

I never put up a full res photo here, regardless…if you want bigger, i can send it to you privately. And how bout that green gilled critter, eh?

Small Images?
By: Douglas Smith (douglas)
2010-09-02 01:54:38 CDT (-0400)

Why so small? What happened to your camera, that it is taking such small images now? This one is less than a magepixel in size, why so small?

Created: 2010-09-02 00:04:35 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2010-09-02 00:06:25 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 44 times, last viewed: 2016-10-26 04:20:06 CDT (-0400)
Show Log