Observation 55238: Ganoderma resinaceum group
When: 2010-10-11
No herbarium specimen

Notes: growing on Red Ash

Proposed Names

48% (2)
Recognized by sight
52% (1)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
White House
By: ndoll
2012-01-18 12:55:24 NZDT (+1300)

I agree this was Ganoderma lucidum, because they grew stipitate and sessile, from the base down to the roots of the tree.

Had it been G. resinaceum, they would be sessile-only, with more conspicuous colors, growing from the base and up the stalk of the tree.

By: Noah Siegel (Noah)
2010-10-13 11:46:01 NZDT (+1300)

it’s a huge tree and small mushroom (about three inches across) and thanks to a telephoto lens… For some reason they object to you climbing over the fence to pick mushrooms.

what, no WHITE shrooms??!
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2010-10-13 02:57:11 NZDT (+1300)

that is a huge old tree or a ridiculously small polypore. god bless our macros!

still, points for set and setting.

By: Paul Derbyshire (Twizzler)
2010-10-12 18:42:01 NZDT (+1300)

I guess this beats observation 10811.

Damn, damn, damn.


By: damon brunette (damonbrunette)
2010-10-12 11:52:09 NZDT (+1300)

so you DO have a sense of humor Noah! Just thought that the time you told me to sniff a mushroom so i could inhale as you guessed maybe 100 springtails, it was a new age health remedy.

By: Tom Volk (TomVolk)
2010-10-12 10:22:17 NZDT (+1300)

Do you have enough security clearance to post that?

By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2010-10-12 10:07:58 NZDT (+1300)

You’re cool, Noah.

Created: 2010-10-12 08:42:09 NZDT (+1300)
Last modified: 2016-06-18 14:39:53 NZST (+1200)
Viewed: 335 times, last viewed: 2017-06-08 18:57:56 NZST (+1200)
Show Log