Observation 57362: Pholiota lenta (Pers.) Singer
When: 2010-10-28
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

28% (1)
Recognized by sight: Hebeloma? Pholiota?
29% (3)
Recognized by sight
63% (3)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight: I don’t think this is Cortinarius because they appeared to be growing from the debris on the forest floor. A good amount of duff was attached to the stem bases.
5% (4)
Recognized by sight
Used references: B/B/F lists as being uncommon.

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
By: Dave W (Dave W)
2010-10-30 10:11:26 EDT (-0400)

as I understand, 57362 resembles the H. radicosum in B/B/F (which is probably actually a Cort) but 57362 is not likely to be a Cort based upon the structure of the veil. Lack of rooting stem supports rejecting radicosum. Pholiota lenta as seen in each of B/B/F and Phillips matches very well. It’s got my vote.

By: Eric Smith (esmith)
2010-10-30 09:38:45 EDT (-0400)

I’m probably the culprit there. I probably cleaned the cap in an effort to make a “clean” photo.

By: walt sturgeon (Mycowalt)
2010-10-30 09:21:49 EDT (-0400)

The Hebeloma photo in Bessette & Fischer is probably a Cortinarius. I saw the fresh collection. Pholiota lenta seems reasonable for this but the lack of debris on the glutinous cap is puzzling.

The caps are quite slimy.
By: Eric Smith (esmith)
2010-10-30 07:12:08 EDT (-0400)

I didn’t notice any rooting stems, in fact they seemed to be attached to the duff as I said before. The gills have a small decurrent “tooth” and small occasional serrations.

H. radicosum
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2010-10-30 06:02:47 EDT (-0400)

is a tough species with a long rooting stem and a strong smell of bitter almonds (unlike all other Hebelomas).
So, I think Pholiota lenta, a late autumn species, is the best idea so far.

Thanks Dave.
By: Eric Smith (esmith)
2010-10-29 20:44:06 EDT (-0400)

I do believe you’re right. I did consider H. radicosum but was confused by the description of the stipe. After re-reading it, I think you’re right.

By: jimmiev
2010-10-28 20:48:40 EDT (-0400)

as observation #57346?


Created: 2010-10-28 20:32:24 EDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2010-12-23 13:27:40 EST (-0500)
Viewed: 175 times, last viewed: 2017-06-08 04:46:33 EDT (-0400)
Show Log