Observation 57723: Hohenbuehelia petaloides (Bull.) Schulzer
When: 2010-11-01
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

43% (3)
Recognized by sight: Isn’t the cap pale for H. petaloides? Growing on hardwood?

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Easy to determine
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2011-07-08 04:04:23 CDT (-0400)

in the microscope if it’s Hohenbuehelia (with large metuloids).

Ty Drew
By: Britney Ramsey (Riverdweller)
2011-07-07 19:23:48 CDT (-0400)
Yes
By: Drew Parker (mycotrope)
2011-07-07 16:48:27 CDT (-0400)

I meant angustata. MO only gave me the one option so I let it go.

It’s known as a northeastern US species, but has been reported at least twice from BC and it appears to be a better fit for color. Maybe a long shot.

angustata?
By: Britney Ramsey (Riverdweller)
2011-07-07 16:29:32 CDT (-0400)

is that what you mean? These were on the ground, but you can see chunks of wood there. No idea what type though.

Other observations here
By: Britney Ramsey (Riverdweller)
2011-07-07 15:34:47 CDT (-0400)

of H. petaloides don’t look right either….lol

I vote Hohenbuehelia
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2011-07-07 15:32:51 CDT (-0400)

but I don’t know about H. petaloides

@ Walt
By: Britney Ramsey (Riverdweller)
2011-07-07 15:20:38 CDT (-0400)

I remember that the gills on these were odd, more like ridges than gills. On the bottom left side of the photo is a spot were the entire ‘gill’ surface scraped off.
P. porrigens seems to have quite distinct gills in age so that seems not to fit here. IDK?

Created: 2010-11-01 09:43:46 CST (-0500)
Last modified: 2011-10-28 12:32:13 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 154 times, last viewed: 2016-10-28 14:58:19 CDT (-0400)
Show Log