Observation 5793: Lentinus bertieri (Fr.) Fr.
When: 2007-12-26
Herbarium specimen reported

Notes: small mushroom on tamarind stump (Tamarindus indica), solitary
ST: 20×2-2.5mm, central, straight, even to slightly clubbed, fuzzy like cap at base becoming less so near top
CAP: 20mm wide, depressed, strongly inrolled, extremely fuzzy (hairs 2mm long and very dense), rich deep brown, almost smooth and blackish in center
FLESH: v thin, light brown
GILL: decur, light brown, turns into pores/reticulation on stem, somewhat close, 1.5mm deep

Yet another small mushroom I’ve failed to get a spore print off of.

I had considered Lentinus briefly (I should have mentioned the erose gill margins), but ruled it out based on the reticulation where the gills meet the stalk (the photo shows it well). I don’t see this feature in the one reported by Ron Pastorino in Texas.

Proposed Names

-59% (4)
Recognized by sight
-37% (3)
Recognized by sight
39% (4)
Recognized by sight
94% (3)
Recognized by sight: pileus densely strigose, margin initially involute, stipe darker below, anastomose/poroid at apex, lamellae pale yellowish brown to dark yelloiwsh brown, tropical distribution.
Used references: Pegler, David N. The Genus Lentinus: A World Monograph. London: H.M.S.O., 1983. 20-22. Print.

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
dontcha love a really good description…
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2012-06-03 17:21:24 CEST (+0200)

that fits your mushroom to a T?

nice work, Danny.

And forunately for you
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2012-06-03 09:58:55 CEST (+0200)

this thing is a total deadringer for L. bertieri, gill color and all. Others are proving to be a bit hairier… metaphorically speaking.

Happy to be of help :)

Nicely done!
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2012-06-03 09:43:05 CEST (+0200)

Lovely to get to the bottom of this thing. Pretty common in the Florida Keys. (Although that might just be because the fruiting bodies last forever in that dry climate…) Thanks, Danny.

By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2012-05-31 02:28:42 CEST (+0200)

I’ve just gotten my first look at Pegler’s 1983 monograph. According to him, L. crinitus is restricted to tropical America, its margin is “inflexed but not involute or only slightly so,” and its pileal surface is described as “closely radially striate to strigose, not distinctly squamose, sun glabrescent and silky shining in the centre…”.

Here’s M.J. Berkley’s 1851 illustration of the type specimen (referred to by Pegler in his L. crinitus comments):

figs. 1a, 1b, 1c & 1d.


A man after my own heart, Pegler laments the “almost universal tendency to regard L. crinitus as a single, highly polymorphic species, ranging from forms with a densely villose pileus, forms with a squamose pileus, to forms with a glabrous pileus…” It seems that, among other characters, the patchy baldness of the true L. crinitus plus its pronounced striations should easily set it apart. What that makes the oodles of other Lentinus on MO, erroneously IDed as L. crinitus simply for being some degree of “hairy,” is another matter altogether.

consensus confusion
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2011-05-06 21:22:26 CEST (+0200)

L. crinitus still wins here because CureCat’s vote for the misspelt L. crinitis is internally counted toward L. crinitus.

Lentinus critterus!
By: Martin Livezey (MLivezey)
2011-05-06 14:39:42 CEST (+0200)
sweet cap.
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2009-02-14 02:13:15 CET (+0100)
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2009-02-14 00:51:28 CET (+0100)

great shot of the topside.

By: Erin Page Blanchard (CureCat)
2007-12-30 19:54:18 CET (+0100)

It looks like Lentinus crinitus rather than Paxillus to me. Any thoughts?

Created: 2007-12-30 19:45:58 CET (+0100)
Last modified: 2012-06-04 03:21:48 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 623 times, last viewed: 2016-10-26 14:59:47 CEST (+0200)
Show Log