Observation 58542: Amanita smithiana Bas
When: 2010-11-11
No herbarium specimen
0 Sequences

Proposed Names

47% (4)
Eye3
Recognized by sight
52% (3)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
The shaggy
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2015-01-03 08:36:08 PST (-0800)

PV remnants, taller stature, and rings of tissue around the stipe base that is pointed below remind me more of A. smithiana. I think without a scope, that species shouldn’t be ruled out.

Yes,You are right.
By: Ron Lawrence (Rondango)
2010-11-16 18:02:02 PST (-0800)

A. silvicola is a better fit. I don’t have access to a scope. Thanks for the direction.

Ron

You might consider Amanita silvicola.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2010-11-16 17:09:25 PST (-0800)

Well, then you might consider Amanita silvicola as a possible name for this observation.

Do you have access to a scope?

Very best,

Rod

No, Rod.
By: Ron Lawrence (Rondango)
2010-11-16 16:15:27 PST (-0800)
Only what is shown on the split photo. Unless it was very thin.
radical?
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2010-11-16 08:17:10 PST (-0800)

Was there a long “rooting” base on this that got cut off?

R.

Created: 2010-11-11 19:24:14 PST (-0800)
Last modified: 2015-01-06 12:58:49 PST (-0800)
Viewed: 95 times, last viewed: 2017-06-08 02:48:59 PDT (-0700)
Show Log