Wow – I said to myself “poison pie” as I collected it, but when it was cut, changed that opinion to H. sinapizans because of the cone. I should have brought it home for a closer scrutiny! So, it looks like both species have the cone.
It’s very interesting that you post this today. I was just looking at a fresh collection of East Bay Hebeloma this morning. Macroscopically I thought “Hebeloma crustuliniforme” group. After cutting the the mushroom longitudinally, it had the same projecting cone as in your picture…so I thought “maybe H. sinapizans”. After scoping the mushroom, I find non-dextrinoid spores. Jan Vesterholt, in “The Genus Hebeloma” says that H. sinapizans has dextrinoid spores, H. crustuliniforme has non-dextrinoid spores. That seems to leave out H. sinapizans…and the cheilocystidia are not ventricose like description of H. sinapizans in the Vesterholt book. I’m puzzled…maybe this isn’t a good character for H. sinapizans…the specimen is sitting next to my scope for further work, which I did not have time to do today. Further study is needed!
Created: 2008-01-12 23:34:27 AST (-0400)
Last modified: 2008-01-12 23:34:27 AST (-0400)
Viewed: 13 times, last viewed: 2016-10-23 07:09:48 AST (-0400)