Observation 63461: Tapinella atrotomentosa (Batsch) Šutara
When: 2008-07-19
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

-84% (1)
Recognized by sight: Just large mature specimens?

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Just revisiting the subject…
By: Andrew Khitsun (Andrew)
2015-11-23 16:54:34 CET (+0100)

Too bad I didn’t know better at the time and didn’t take a photo of the stipe. After years of comparing this mushroom to dozens of other possible matches, I will have to agree with T.atrotomentosa. The only thing that bothered me all this time (and still does) is the size. Authors cap the cap size ;) at 15 cm, where this one was 20+. But I swear I saw other specimen that exceed “supposed” limit.

.
By: Erin Page Blanchard (CureCat)
2011-02-12 06:21:52 CET (+0100)

Well Paxillus and Tapinella are related and used to all be in Paxillus.

Thanks Curecat!
By: Tim Sage (T. Sage)
2011-02-12 05:30:47 CET (+0100)

I knew I had the mushroom in my head somewhere, but had trouble accessing it….

Huge
By: Andrew Khitsun (Andrew)
2011-02-12 05:11:49 CET (+0100)

These mushrooms were huge (almost dinner plate size)

Created: 2011-02-12 05:09:04 CET (+0100)
Last modified: 2015-11-23 16:54:53 CET (+0100)
Viewed: 78 times, last viewed: 2017-06-08 15:57:38 CEST (+0200)
Show Log