Observation 63516: “Discomycetes” Sacc.
When: 2011-02-13
Herbarium specimen reported
0 Sequences

Proposed Names

29% (1)
Recognized by sight
27% (1)
Recognized by sight
29% (1)
Used references: Suggested by Tea Von Bonsdorff
57% (1)
Recognized by sight
28% (1)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
getting to genus
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2011-02-17 14:16:58 JST (+0900)

much less species, will likely be out of reach without more information (substrate, closer photos, photomicrography).

agreed mxyo.. strange enough
By: damon brunette (damonbrunette)
2011-02-17 13:15:07 JST (+0900)

i went on the hyperlink you sent for the wiki to learn that indeed these were all basidio, as i always think asco when i see something this small. So thanks for teaching me that.

But upon scrolling down, i saw a picture of a Merismodes i took this spring and is now on wiki. What a coincidence!

That being said, i think (guess) that this observation may be Hyaloscypha hyalina as described in Fungi of Britain and Europe (Buczacki). This is an asco however
so tough to say
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2011-02-14 22:03:44 JST (+0900)

I’ve found this site: http://www.ascofrance.com/index.php?r=bdd&page=search to be an invaluable resource for such finds, but it would be that much more useful if it were possible to limit search results to a combination of user-specified criteria (ie: stipitate/sessile, hairy/smooth margin, etc.), not simply substrate & genus or species name. what were the conditions like? (dry, wet, average) Were any of the fruiting bodies more open/cupulate/planar than these?

I believe them to be sessile, yes.
By: Tim Sage (T. Sage)
2011-02-14 06:56:04 JST (+0900)


Thanks for the comments so far, fellas!

By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2011-02-14 06:36:26 JST (+0900)

these look sessile. can you confirm this? also, any id on the tree genus the leaf belongs to?

Similar to this
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2011-02-14 06:26:37 JST (+0900)


But I have very little confidence in the genus I proposed for it…

Created: 2011-02-14 04:31:48 JST (+0900)
Last modified: 2017-06-09 10:49:12 JST (+0900)
Viewed: 142 times, last viewed: 2017-06-10 00:32:20 JST (+0900)
Show Log