Notes: Getting back to this one, to use as a comparison to other Camarophyllus species, and adding some micro-shots.
The first micro-shot is of a gill section, at 100x in KOH. Here it can clearly be seen the interwoven lamellar trama between the rows of basidia, so clearly a Camarophyllus species. The next micro-shot is of a very thin gill section at 400x in KOH. And here you can see the elongated basidia of Hygrophorus species, a row of connective cells, and again the interwoven trama, this shot doesn’t really point out anything for the id, but I thought it was a pretty good looking section. The third micro-shot is of tissue from the upper stipe surface, to look for mature spore sizes. Unfortunately I couldn’t find a spot with lots of spores in focus at once, so only two spore here. This is at 1000x in KOH, and I still can’t quite get 1000x in focus in camera yet.
But here the spores have on oil drop in them, and are elliptical.
The ave spore sizes are : 7.06 × 5.77 microns – q : 1.23, on 7 spores. But I haven’t really calibrated the scope’s reticule yet, and I think this might be high.
Anyway, here is a baseline for a well known Camarophyllus species. One thing I learned with inamyloid, non-dextrinoid, hyline stuff, don’t just use KOH… next time on Hygrophorus, use the Congo Red first…
Camarophyllus pratensis (Pers.) P. Kumm. on MyCoPortal
Camarophyllus pratensis on MycoBank
Preferred Name: Cuphophyllus pratensis (Fr.) Bon
More Observations of Camarophyllus pratensis (Pers.) P. Kumm. (18)
More Observations of Cuphophyllus pratensis (Fr.) Bon (88)
More Observations (all synonyms) (122)
Similar Observations (29)
Public Description (Default) [Edit]
|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||10.26||2|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
I have also seen both skinny and fat versions, but the skinny was unusual enough to me at the time that I illustrated the difference. I will photograph it and post it.
Small, slender specimens are the norm, or were until this season, at the park (Howarth)where I frequently find C. pratensis.
Otherwise it looks right colorwise…D.
Was it growing in deep duff? I’m used to this species been more stout.
Created: 2008-02-11 21:38:53 PST (-0800)
Last modified: 2008-03-06 13:15:33 PST (-0800)
Viewed: 41 times, last viewed: 2016-10-28 09:43:58 PDT (-0700)