Notes: I suppose that this species of Caloplaca must be uncommon, since the websites that I use frequently to access a description of lichens don’t mention it. Even the CNALH page does not have a description or photos of it. However, it appears in Stridvall gallery with very nice photos. Another very nice photo of the species appears in flickr .
The white thallus of the species in contrast with the red/ferruginous apothecia is a distinctive character of this species. However, there was a point that make me delayed to have a proposal for the name of the species, which was the K+ rose reaction in thallus that I never saw in a Caloplaca and that is not referred in the page ac-lille, where I encountered a description of the species and some photos as well. The K+ purple reaction on apothecia is a characteristic of the genus.
Obs.: The name Caloplaca erythrocarpa does not appears in index fungorum. There is a Caloplaca erythrocarpia which is deprecated in favor of Caloplaca teicholyta, but this one is quite different from my specimen.
|I’d Call It That||3.0||0.00||0|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
is a good explanation. I will try to confirm or deny it in a forthcoming oportunity. Thanks, Jason.
I’d bet that the apparent “K+ rose” reaction in the thallus is the (very strong) K+ purple reaction from the apothecia bleeding onto the thallus surrounding. I bet if you could carefully test just the thallus you’d find different reaction.
Fascinating and striking species! The only other genera with K+ red/purple reaction like this are Haematomma (apothecia with thalline rims) and Ramboldia / Pyrrhospora (rim same color as disc). (Oh right, and Ophioparma.)
Created: 2011-05-17 21:35:43 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2011-05-17 22:55:52 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 59 times, last viewed: 2016-10-26 09:08:10 CEST (+0200)