Observation 67638: Tulostoma Pers.
When: 2011-05-19
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

92% (2)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight
58% (1)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Well
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2011-05-21 09:20:13 CEST (+0200)

You could expect brumale if the head isn’t exceeding 10 mm (usually around 7-8 mm). If larger, I beleive it’s something else.

Anyway, I don’t think the genus Tulostoma is investigated well enough to put a name on this.

This one
By: Eva Skific (Evica)
2011-05-20 22:34:56 CEST (+0200)

was less then 2 cm

Earlier obses
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2011-05-20 18:03:56 CEST (+0200)

from this area have been named Tulostoma beccarianum, which is said to be a larger species than brumale. Is this one smaller than they were?

I’m not able to tell the difference, but just for fun, I had a look at available DNA sequences (one beccarianum, three brumale and a few others).
T. beccarianum was clearly different from the others, but one of the brumale collections was too! That indicates that there are more “hidden” species out there..

Created: 2011-05-19 23:28:16 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2011-05-21 09:20:34 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 88 times, last viewed: 2016-03-30 08:30:32 CEST (+0200)
Show Log