Observation 68258: Geastrum pectinatum Pers.
When: 2011-05-28
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

84% (4)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Thank you for the clarification!
By: Tim Sage (T. Sage)
2011-05-30 13:35:37 EDT (-0400)

I agree it can’t be much else. Thanks for you input, very much!

Sorry, my error
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2011-05-30 13:24:10 EDT (-0400)

I have a book with swedish earthstars, and there’s a scheme with the number of rays. On a closer look I realize that the rows with species names are displaced in the scheme, and the numbers refer to quadrifidum (of course! What was I thinking..?)
Anyway, I have seen them with less than 5 rays. And I don’t know of any other possibilities, except that there are some different varieties of it described.

Arora says 5-12 rays, usually 6-10….
By: Tim Sage (T. Sage)
2011-05-30 12:23:14 EDT (-0400)

So that is why I was wondering. Do you have a source that says 3-5? These two specimens each had 4.

I still think G. pectinatum is likely, I was just curious if anyone knew of any other possibilities.

Agree with pectinatum
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2011-05-30 03:33:37 EDT (-0400)

It’s also one of the species with the fewest rays, usually 3-5.

Anyone know of anything similar?
By: Tim Sage (T. Sage)
2011-05-29 14:14:35 EDT (-0400)

The two I plucked only had 4 large rays as opposed to 5 or 6 like G. pectinatum. Any ideas of other beaked Earthstars with a pedicel?

cool find!
By: Britney Ramsey (Riverdweller)
2011-05-29 00:17:34 EDT (-0400)

these are neat!

Created: 2011-05-28 23:59:37 EDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2011-05-30 02:05:38 EDT (-0400)
Viewed: 159 times, last viewed: 2016-10-24 05:00:44 EDT (-0400)
Show Log