|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||6.67||1||(Evica)|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
good explanation :)
I personally recognize M.heamatopus from M. sanguinoleta
on two things
From the key to Norwegian Mycena (http://home.online.no/~araronse/Mycenakey/haematopus.htm)
“….Lange (1914) described M. haematopus var. marginata, characterized by the lamellae having a reddish edge. Several authors, however, (e.g. Maas Geesteranus 1988: 398d) have stated that the colouration of the lamellar edge in M. haematopus is too variable to have any taxonomic significance.
M. haematopus is the only member of sect. Galactopoda (Earle) Maas Geest., but is not always easy to tell apart from M. sanguinolenta belonging to sect. Sanguinolentae Maas Geest. The cheilocystidia of M. sanguinolenta are generally more sharply acuminate, but an even better feature to differentiate the two species is the shape of the caulocystidia. In M. sanguinolenta they are usually narrowly tipped…"
Created: 2011-05-29 22:32:47 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2011-05-30 01:10:54 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 83 times, last viewed: 2016-10-25 20:25:00 CEST (+0200)