Observation 6846: Rimbachia bryophila (Pers.) Redhead
When: 2008-02-20
Herbarium specimen reported

Notes: Glaringly white, pleurotoid, shallow, distant gills, reduced to non-existant lateral stipe, growing in moss.

Proposed Names

53% (3)
Eye3
Recognized by sight
-3% (3)
Recognized by sight
Used references: Descriptions can be found here:
.
Segedin, B. (1994). Studies in the Agaricales of New Zealand: new records and new species of the genera Cheimonophyllum, Mniopetalum, and Anthracophyllum (Tricholomataceae, Collybieae). New Zeal. Journ. Bot. 32, 61-72.
.
Watling, Roy & Gregory, Norma M. (1989). British Fungus Flora: Agarics and Boleti. Vol 6. Crepidotaceae and other pleurotoid agarics. Royal Botanic Garden: Edinburgh, Scotland. 157p.
84% (5)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight: Cheimonophyllum candidissimum has a stipe, which I do not see in the photos, whereas Rimbachia bryophila has no stipe. Also, The former grows on wood, yet the latter grows in association with moss… These are growing from wood and moss, but the absent stipe is what makes me pretty confident it is R. bryophila.

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Rimbachia bryophila it is!
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2008-02-21 18:26:52 EST (-0500)

No stipe; and that stick (from which one was fruiting) might have been an anomaly; when I pulled the dirt clod apart to stick them on the dryer, there were no other bits of wood underneath the moss.
Thanks, guys. Cool little (and I do mean little) shroom.

Rimbachia & Cheimonophyllum
By: Michael Wood (mykoweb)
2008-02-21 14:57:13 EST (-0500)

Cheimonophyllum does have a stipe…if these are stipeless, then Rimbachia bryophila is a better choice. Rimbachia bryophila is much more common locally than Cheimonophyllum candidissimum.

Created: 2008-02-21 10:34:13 EST (-0500)
Last modified: 2008-02-22 10:50:24 EST (-0500)
Viewed: 101 times, last viewed: 2016-10-22 20:05:23 EDT (-0400)