Notes: At first I thought this was a Volvariella, then I noticed it didn’t have a volva. It had free gills and the older specimen’s gills were starting to turn pink, so I concluded it was a Pluteus. However, when I got home and tried to look it up, I realized that Pluteus doesn’t normally have a ring. Arora makes a comment about the genus Chamaeota as a genus in the Pluteaceae that has no volva, but does have a ring. None of the other books I checked even mentioned the genus. Looking on the web I found a photograph of Chamaeota sphaerospora on MushroomExpert.Com, but no other photos.
However, when Darvin looked at it he suggested that it might just be Leucoagaricus leucothites. This seems pretty likely. I put the specimen on the drier before I took an actual sporeprint.
I also check a couple of microscopic feature based on an email from Else Vellinga. The spores definitely had a germ pore and the gill trama did not appear to be convergent as it would be for Chamaeota.
|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||1.76||1|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
Created: 2006-10-05 00:13:43 MDT (-0600)
Last modified: 2006-10-05 22:44:13 MDT (-0600)
Viewed: 29 times, last viewed: 2017-06-04 14:17:27 MDT (-0600)