Notes: Again some identification problems with the specimen that seems to me to have the appearance of a Flavoparmelia. With such granular soredia could be F. caperata. But, the existence of so marked (sharp, visible) ridges on the upperside of lobes makes me doubt. Another question is: what are the “big” black rounded structures that one can see on the lobes? Pycnidia?
|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||0.00||0|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
Just do an image search on Flavoparmelia caperata. Most of the images on MO show these ridges to some extent. This one is very pronounced, for example:
Pustulate species are often ridged like this. I’d guess that they’re related: the pustules form on these ridges, possibly they are just the end result of ridges becoming overly-developed and “bursting”.
F. baltimorensis is out of question, because we don’t have here.
What about the ridges? are they common? This was my main point of doubt and because of it I even thought that could be another genus.
Was this on bark? The soredia are not obvious to my eye, but the pustules do seem to be fragile and hollow, suggesting caperata and not baltimorensis.
The black spots could be a parasitic fungus. I don’t recall seeing pycnidia in these species, and besides they look a little to large and flat to be pycnidia, more like ink spots than bulging round structures.
Created: 2011-09-14 15:04:29 PDT (-0700)
Last modified: 2011-09-14 16:12:44 PDT (-0700)
Viewed: 78 times, last viewed: 2016-03-30 18:39:37 PDT (-0700)