Observation 77850: Inocybe hystrix (Fr.) P. Karst.
When: 2011-10-02
No herbarium specimen

Notes: Under Abies (fir), 3100 meters elevation.

Images

172116
172113
172114
172115
172117
172118
172119
172120
172121
172122
172123
172124
172128
This pleurocystidia is 60 micrometers long.
172129
pleurocystidia
172130
pleurocystidia
172131
pleurocystidia
172132
pleurocystidia
172133
pileipellis, pileus trama
172134
pileipellis, pileus trama
172135
cheilocystidia
172136
cheilocystidia
172137
cheilocystidia
172141
pleurocystidia
172142
pleurocystidia
172143
pleurocystidia
172144
spores 1000x
172145
spores 1000x
172146
spores 1000x

Proposed Names

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
nice documentation, Alan…
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2011-10-05 17:19:15 CEST (+0200)

looks like you have access to a fine microscope in Mexico, too!

And I bet…
By: Dimitar Bojantchev (dimitar)
2011-10-05 09:11:52 CEST (+0200)

…it is something like 7%(!!) BLAST different from the real I. hystrix, if we even know what it is. Inocybe appears to be an ancient genus (something I sensed even as a beginner, when I first fell in love with the genus) that has rather similar species that have drifted far apart genetically due to allopatric speciation.

D.
Another difference
By: Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
2011-10-05 03:05:51 CEST (+0200)

I. hystrix is supposed to grow with hardwoods and this was with fir.

Very nice documentation
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2011-10-03 20:53:49 CEST (+0200)

It really resembles hystrix. The spores look fine too, both shape and size, but the cystidia are so weird – never seen anything like them.

Created: 2011-10-03 00:43:53 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2011-10-03 00:43:59 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 116 times, last viewed: 2016-10-25 12:39:53 CEST (+0200)
Show Log