Observation 79505: Hygrocybe (Fr.) P. Kumm.
When: 2011-10-09
No herbarium specimen

Notes: No odor or taste.

Proposed Names

65% (4)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight: No flavor or odor.
-23% (2)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
nice follow-up Alan.
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2014-10-03 01:48:50 CEST (+0200)
Red Gliophorus
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2014-10-02 23:40:45 CEST (+0200)

I think there are some red Gliophorus (or at least things we’d currently call Gliophorus).

This one looks more pinkish, but either way, I would not be surprised if it did belong to the clade with Gliophorus in it. Except for the stipe being dry, it reminds me of these observation 49686

Here’s one:

And then there are the reddish-orange forms of G. psittacinus that can be found across most of the range (which sometimes get called G. perplexus).

And sometimes G. laetus looks very red: observation 137542

There’s also a very orange one in Santa Cruz that I’ve been provisionally calling G. fenestrus.

Thanks for following up.
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2014-10-02 23:30:22 CEST (+0200)
Spoke with Dr. Lodge
By: Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
2014-10-02 23:18:20 CEST (+0200)

She says this collection is definitely a Hygrocybe due to the pigmentation. While there are some very viscid Hygrocybe species, the pigments are different in Hygrocybe and Gliophorus. There are no red Gliophorus species.

My mistake
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2014-10-02 21:18:07 CEST (+0200)

Neither is G. psittacinus, necessarily. I have found it in a decidedly non-viscid, fresh state.

G. psittacina is extremely viscid
By: Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
2014-10-02 18:33:17 CEST (+0200)

As are all members of Gliophorus, as far as I know. G. psittacina is so viscid that it is difficult to pull out of the ground without breaking it.

next time …
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2014-10-02 18:13:10 CEST (+0200)

send these to Jean Lodge.

Neither is G. psittacinus
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2014-10-02 17:37:06 CEST (+0200)

which this resembles. The pearlescent stipe is the main feature drawing my attention.

This species is not very viscid
By: Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
2014-10-02 16:35:30 CEST (+0200)

I think Hygrocybe is more likely than Gliophorus.

By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2011-12-21 19:34:26 CET (+0100)

looking forward to your “Mexican Mushroom Greatest Hits” program (your title may vary) for BAMS, in May!

By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2011-10-15 05:29:36 CEST (+0200)

seems like it must be… but this is Mexico.

By: caphillkid
2011-10-14 23:14:43 CEST (+0200)

Striking colors. Maybe Hygrocybe?

Created: 2011-10-14 03:54:22 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2014-10-02 23:11:56 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 173 times, last viewed: 2016-10-26 16:21:22 CEST (+0200)
Show Log