This also appears to be an Amanita, possibly Amanati cinereoannulosa?
|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||5.93||1||(kundabungkid)|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
Rod, Thanks again for your input and description. It is heaps better than a blank.
I dont think you will have any disagreements on ID.
If this is an Amanita (and it certainly could be), I don’t think it can be cinereoannulosa. The latter is probably assignable to Amanita sect. Caesareae and would have no flocculence on the cap. Moreover, it would probably have a gray skirt-like partial veil…or the remains of one. A stipe uniformly covered with flocculence from near the apex down to the substrate (as in the pictures of 7970) is very unlikely to have had a partial veil (they often mark some point at which the forms of decoration on the stipe [if any] are divided). If this entity is an Amanita. I would think it would belong in sect. Lepidella.
Created: 2008-06-17 09:22:08 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2010-08-15 02:41:43 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 26 times, last viewed: 2017-06-05 00:28:02 CDT (-0400)