Observation 8040: Lentinus subgenus Panus sect. Velutini Pegler
When: 2008-06-10
Herbarium specimen reported

Notes: Found in the aptly named Big Sandy Creek Unit of the Big Thicket growing on buried wood and a sclerotium which can be seen in some of the photos. Most everything seems to match the descriptions if not the photos in the references. Lots of sand on the specimens which I should have brushed off more completely.
This species has undergone several name changes in a relatively short time….Lentinus siparius to Panus siparius to Lentinus tephroleucus.

Proposed Names

51% (2)
Used references: Mushrooms of the Southeastern US, Bessette et al. and Texas Mushrooms, Metzler
28% (1)
Recognized by sight: current name
56% (1)
Recognized by sight
86% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Used references: Mushrooms of the Southeastern US, Bessette et al. and Texas Mushrooms, Metzler

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
i am not fond of Pegler’s naming scheme either,
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2014-02-10 16:28:32 PST (-0800)

but another/newer/simpler reference for section-level treatment of Panus and Lentinus is still beyond our reach. word has it the Hibbett lab seeks to remedy this with a molecular revival of Lentinus research. there’s also this elusive text..:

http://books.google.com/...

it is reportedly available via ProQuest, the successor to University Microfilms.

I dunno about the current name on these…
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2014-02-06 18:07:39 PST (-0800)

but they sure are as bristly as all Texas.

I see it in your ob’s photos
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2013-01-16 12:28:15 PST (-0800)

so going through the last comment’s steps won’t be necessary, but it’s a good tool to have on hand for general use.

that photograph looks a lot like things I’ve casually called and heard called L. velutinus. I don’t have the monograph in front of me at the moment. I’ll come back to this when I get home.

Photo adding instructions
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2013-01-16 12:19:47 PST (-0800)

1. Go to bayimg.com
2. ‘Browse’ for the image file on your computer and enter a removal code (can be anything)
3. Click on the image once it’s uploaded
4. Right-click the now full-size version of your image and select ‘Copy Image Location.’
5. Paste the image url in between exclamation marks anywhere on MO, like so:

this link has spaces between the !s to show the syntax:

! http://thumbs.bayimg.com/... !

with the spaces removed, !s touching each end of the url, an image will be displayed:

Danny, I don’t know how to add a photo
By: Ron Pastorino (Ronpast)
2013-01-16 08:37:27 PST (-0800)

to the comments but I did take a photo of the Bessette photo and added it to my group.

Thanks, Ron
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2013-01-15 22:56:28 PST (-0800)

I see the description, but Google has kindly blocked the corresponding images. Bessette’s measurements definitely conflict with Pegler’s. No idea who’s “right.” If feasible, you might consider uploading Bassette’s color plate(s).

The description in the Bessette book says
By: Ron Pastorino (Ronpast)
2013-01-15 22:46:40 PST (-0800)

that the stipe can be 1.5-12mm thick.
If you google Lentinus tephroleucus + Bessette, the description will come up from that book.

Pegler
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2013-01-15 21:03:49 PST (-0800)

included this in his sect. Velutini of Lentinus subg. Panus, meaning it ought to have a velutinous stem. sadly, yours are all covered with sand! they also appear to far exceed Pegler’s stipe width limitations of 4mm. I’m curious what your two books’ entries for L. tephroleucus look like…

Another cool Texas Lentinus!
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2008-06-21 08:08:32 PDT (-0700)

..were they worth all of the bugbites? ;)

Created: 2008-06-20 21:15:07 PDT (-0700)
Last modified: 2014-02-06 16:30:08 PST (-0800)
Viewed: 286 times, last viewed: 2016-07-13 12:42:14 PDT (-0700)
Show Log