Observation 81510: Coprinellus truncorum (Scop.) Redhead, Vilgalys & Moncalvo
When: 2011-11-05
Who: zaca
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

43% (4)
Recognized by sight
-42% (3)
Recognized by sight: Fresh caps in bottom photo resemble micaceous.
58% (3)
Eye3 Eyes3
Based on microscopic features: No caulocystidia, spore shape fits well, the size within truncorum (although at the upper limit)

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
OK! but not satisfactory.
By: zaca
2011-11-08 00:41:25 IST (+0530)
By: Europe-coprinologist
2011-11-08 00:35:11 IST (+0530)

Also in the options there are three criteria that are equally accurate.

Family: Psathyrellaceae. right. genre: Coprinellus sp. right. Species: Coprinellus truncorum. Right. The three options are equally valid.
By: Europe-coprinologist
2011-11-08 00:32:15 IST (+0530)

Hello Zaca.

My opinion was before seeing the spores. After seeing the spores I can say something more precise.
Dear E-C,
By: zaca
2011-11-07 20:14:33 IST (+0530)

Then your vote is not accordingly with the words …
Thanks, for your opinion.

By: Europe-coprinologist
2011-11-07 20:05:51 IST (+0530)

These spores are very typical of the species and give it its name. It is certainly Coprinellus truncorum.

Data from microscopy added.
By: zaca
2011-11-07 17:01:02 IST (+0530)

Due to deliquescence was difficult to make a preparation. I didn’t observe any caulocystidia. The spores have a peculiar shape, being truncated on one of the ends. I got the following average dimensions:
Me = 9.5 × 6.6 µm ; Qe = 1.4 (N=45).

By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2011-11-06 15:53:36 IST (+0530)

caulocystidia are lacking, this might be Coprinellus truncorum.

Created: 2011-11-06 03:01:02 IST (+0530)
Last modified: 2011-11-08 00:38:44 IST (+0530)
Viewed: 155 times, last viewed: 2016-10-24 10:58:36 IST (+0530)
Show Log