Observation 81510: Coprinellus truncorum (Scop.) Redhead, Vilgalys & Moncalvo
When: 2011-11-05
Who: zaca
No herbarium specimen
0 Sequences

Proposed Names

43% (4)
Recognized by sight
-42% (3)
Recognized by sight: Fresh caps in bottom photo resemble micaceous.
58% (3)
Eye3 Eyes3
Based on microscopic features: No caulocystidia, spore shape fits well, the size within truncorum (although at the upper limit)

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
OK! but not satisfactory.
By: zaca
2011-11-07 11:11:25 PST (-0800)
By: Europe-coprinologist
2011-11-07 11:05:11 PST (-0800)

Also in the options there are three criteria that are equally accurate.

Family: Psathyrellaceae. right. genre: Coprinellus sp. right. Species: Coprinellus truncorum. Right. The three options are equally valid.
By: Europe-coprinologist
2011-11-07 11:02:15 PST (-0800)

Hello Zaca.

My opinion was before seeing the spores. After seeing the spores I can say something more precise.
Dear E-C,
By: zaca
2011-11-07 06:44:33 PST (-0800)

Then your vote is not accordingly with the words …
Thanks, for your opinion.

..
By: Europe-coprinologist
2011-11-07 06:35:51 PST (-0800)

These spores are very typical of the species and give it its name. It is certainly Coprinellus truncorum.

Data from microscopy added.
By: zaca
2011-11-07 03:31:02 PST (-0800)

Due to deliquescence was difficult to make a preparation. I didn’t observe any caulocystidia. The spores have a peculiar shape, being truncated on one of the ends. I got the following average dimensions:
Me = 9.5 × 6.6 µm ; Qe = 1.4 (N=45).

If
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2011-11-06 02:23:36 PST (-0800)

caulocystidia are lacking, this might be Coprinellus truncorum.

Created: 2011-11-05 14:31:02 PDT (-0700)
Last modified: 2011-11-07 11:08:44 PST (-0800)
Viewed: 164 times, last viewed: 2017-06-10 00:34:49 PDT (-0700)
Show Log