Observation 82498: Hebeloma (Fr.) P. Kumm.
When: 2011-10-30
Herbarium specimen reported

Notes: Found under live oak, C. bay.

In a seepage area. Haven’t found a good collection of this one in years. Probably an undescribed species, but I need more good collections, not just this little cap here and there.

Proposed Names

29% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Well…
By: Douglas Smith (douglas)
2011-11-15 00:39:33 EET (+0200)

Well, I think you mean Phaeogalera? Well, no I think the one that I saw in California that looked like that is here:

http://mushroomobserver.org/65896

And then I saw that actual one in Europe here:

http://mushroomobserver.org/65294

But this one is the same as these from the same area, in the past years:

http://mushroomobserver.org/1005
http://mushroomobserver.org/1096
http://mushroomobserver.org/4910

And shoot, I looked at it under the scope, and I might have never posted it here? Well, are you going to go and make me prove it?… I’ll have to look up the scope work from years ago on these, and see if I posted it.

Really, this is just one little guy, not THAT interesting… There were better collections in years past…

Another genus?
By: else
2011-11-14 21:48:38 EET (+0200)

Are you sure this is a Hebeloma species and not something close to Meottomyces dissimulans (also known as Pholiota oedipus)?

i hear
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2011-11-14 21:33:49 EET (+0200)

it’s riddled with enough “if not, then”-s to make your head spin.

a first sighting for me as well. nice find, doug.

Well…
By: Douglas Smith (douglas)
2011-11-14 19:14:38 EET (+0200)

I don’t know, it isn’t that surprising… Here are a few from California:

http://mushroomobserver.org/46632
http://mushroomobserver.org/6788
http://mushroomobserver.org/4499
http://mushroomobserver.org/4449
http://mushroomobserver.org/1005

And from Europe:

http://mushroomobserver.org/81799
http://mushroomobserver.org/26904

But back to specifically these, they aren’t in that Monograph, I’ve looked a few times. Not that that monograph is all that understandable…

Wow
By: Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
2011-11-14 18:57:34 EET (+0200)

I have never before seen a mushroom that might be in the veiled Hebeloma monograph.

Created: 2011-11-14 18:51:02 EET (+0200)
Last modified: 2011-11-14 18:51:03 EET (+0200)
Viewed: 72 times, last viewed: 2016-03-31 16:15:28 EEST (+0300)
Show Log