Observation 84195: Psathyrella vinosofulva P.D. Orton
When: 2011-12-01
Who: zaca
No herbarium specimen

Notes: Growing up in a meadow area with lots of wood buried.

Images

187744
187745
187746
187747
187748
187749
187750
187751
187757
201962
Basidia and Cystidia;
201967
Stiptipelis (left-top corner) and Pileopellis (others).
587525
Microscopy (4 years later): Spores;
587526
Microscopy (4 years later): Basidia and pleurocystidia;
587527
Microscopy (4 years later): Cheilocystidia-1;
587528
Microscopy (4 years later): Cheilocystidia-2;
587529
Microscopy (4 years later): Veil;
587530
Microscopy (4 years later): Pileipellis;
587531
Microscopy (4 years later): Stiptipellis and caulocystidia.

Proposed Names

29% (1)
Recognized by sight
-18% (2)
Recognized by sight: HAVE lot of ressemblance, however i think it is quite brown for this specie.
58% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight: Antonio Valero suggestion.
Based on microscopic features: See attached photos.

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Thanks, Martin.
By: zaca
2016-01-02 16:42:56 PST (-0800)

At the time the id was solely based on the appearance, since someone suggest the name based only on the photos. After I made some “bad microscopy with my bad equipment at the time” and could see some features, which I compare with those of “Champignons du Quebec” (see the link at my comments). More recently I saw the description in A. Melzer’s website and everything matchs nicely.
Related to your question, some times I use isotonic saline, but I don’t see any big difference, from the pure water.

Nice job!
By: Martin Livezey (MLivezey)
2016-01-02 15:58:14 PST (-0800)

I have not heard of this species, and it is quite beautiful. Those spores look coprinoid no doubt! When you moistened them, did you use isotonic saline? Unless so, I am told my one that you may get inaccurate measurements. Is your ID solely on the basis of spore size?

New data from microscopy; 4 years later.
By: zaca
2016-01-02 13:17:40 PST (-0800)
New microscopic data added.
By: zaca
2012-03-02 15:10:10 PST (-0800)

I think that the microscopy confirms the identification suggested by Antonio of Psathyrella vinosofulva.

Psathyrella vinosofulva
By: zaca
2012-03-01 15:14:22 PST (-0800)

seems to be a good proposal not only to the macro but also to the spores, which according Roland Labbé (see here) are" ellipsoides, lisses, avec pore germinatif, gris-brun foncé, 10,9-14,1 × 5,6-7,5 um; Q=1,7-2,2". I may have a dried specimen and I’ll try to make some slides to observe under the microscope. If successful I’ll update this observation.
Thanks, Antonio, for your comment.

por macro..
By: Anto (Antonio Valero)
2012-02-29 17:38:40 PST (-0800)

tal vez Psathyrella vinosofulva

I never …
By: zaca
2011-12-08 13:16:49 PST (-0800)

found Psathyrella hirtosquamulosa. Maybe it has some similarities with these specimens, but judging by the spores dimensions (Spores 6-7,5(8) x 4,5-5, 5(6) x 4-5 µm, seen at vielepilze) it is another species. Thank s, Jonathan M, for your proposal.

Any idea about the species?
By: zaca
2011-12-07 13:34:41 PST (-0800)
Wow!
By: Andrew Heath (Quercus)
2011-12-06 18:21:59 PST (-0800)

That’s awesome!

Created: 2011-12-06 14:48:37 PST (-0800)
Last modified: 2016-01-02 13:16:57 PST (-0800)
Viewed: 346 times, last viewed: 2016-11-01 07:55:52 PDT (-0700)
Show Log