Images
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 5.19 | 1 | (royh) | |||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
2.51 | 83.83% | |||||||
Comments
Add Comment
No, we have not described any ballouioids from Qld or other parts of Australia (yet). You can find access to past publications at: http://www.nybg.org/bsci/res/hall/boletes/publications.html. The rest of that site has moved to: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/boletineae/index.php which I hope you will find more informative. Thanks!
is it this paper where you describe this Tylopilus from Queensland that I also found? If it is, could you please send me a copy? Thx.
there are a bunch of these ‘ballouioids’ that I, my students and collaborators have collected. For now, we are trying to get them sorted out but the data points to a phylogenetic relationship with Tylopilus balloui as we know it in the Americas. A recent paper in Mycotaxon by T. Osmundson & R. Halling is a start to that process. Cheers!
…and I will never look at the pores of T. balloui the same again. I especially enjoy the example of DIC.
Created: 2012-01-12 15:34:22 CST (-0500)
Last modified: 2012-01-12 15:34:27 CST (-0500)
Viewed: 100 times, last viewed: 2017-06-10 08:37:25 CDT (-0400)
Show Log
Keep me informed.