Observation 86237: Clitocybe subconnexa Murrill
When: 2012-01-04
Who: PolloAsado
No herbarium specimen

Notes: Lost specimen on foray; unable to identify. I do remember this mushroom having a hollow stipe and rubber-like consistency.

Proposed Names

2% (5)
Eye3
Recognized by sight
53% (3)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight: The cap texture looks a little off, but the darkening gills and clustered growth look good… Would have to have seen younger ones to be sure
13% (3)
Recognized by sight
-15% (2)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Hello Joe. I anser you before 48 h
By: GALL Alain (GALLA-TAHITI)
2016-06-05 04:03:12 CEST (+0200)

Our Internet is realy too bad actually

Re: “AGARICALES UNDERW. IS A TRUE TAXON …”
By: Joe Cohen (Joseph D. Cohen)
2016-06-05 01:36:30 CEST (+0200)

Alain:
1. MO intends to allow other users to identify an Observation as Agaricales sensu lato.
2. If you think a narrower identification is appropriate, please just vote for the narrower taxon. It is unnecessary and contrary to the intent of MO to aggressively down-vote a taxon which is a superset. Other users generally will appreciate your contributions more if you can do this.
3. Please stop posting these comments. All of the information in them is already present in MO, either directly in this Observation, or via a search. The Comments seem to add little or no value to MO, and make both this Observation and the Changes page harder to use. As with #2 above, Other users generally will appreciate your contributions more if you can do this.
Regards,
— Joe
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Google Traduction:

1. MO entend permettre à d’autres utilisateurs d’identifier une Observation comme Agaricales sensu lato.
2. Si vous pensez une identification plus étroite est nécessaire, s’il vous plaît simplement voter pour le taxon plus étroit. Il est inutile et contraire à l’intention du MO à agressivement bas-vote un taxon qui est un surensemble. Les autres utilisateurs seront généralement apprécier vos contributions plus si vous pouvez le faire.
3. S’il vous plaît arrêter l’affichage de ces Commentaires. Toutes les informations en eux est déjà présent dans MO, soit directement dans cette Observation, ou via une recherche. Les Commentaires semblent ajouter peu ou pas de valeur à MO, et de faire à la fois cette Observation et le Journal d’activité plus difficile à utiliser. Comme # 2 ci-dessus, d’autres utilisateurs seront généralement apprécier vos contributions plus si vous pouvez le faire.

— Joe

AGARICALES UNDERW. IS A TRUE TAXON. THIS OBS SEEM IDENTIFIABLE
By: GALL Alain (GALLA-TAHITI)
2016-06-04 23:44:03 CEST (+0200)

SEE THE OTHERS WITH ONE CLIC.
http://mushroomobserver.org/comment/comment_search?pattern=AGARICALES+UNDERW.+IS+A+TRUE+TAXON.+THIS+OBS+SEEM+IDENTIFIABLE.
Agaricales sensu lato AS BEEN CREATED BY MYXOMOP.
SEE HIS COMMENT ON. http://mushroomobserver.org/name/show_name/31029?q=2mGEk
ACTUALLY.
Agaricales sensu lato 3781 OBS = 252 pages
BUT
Agaricales Underw. 1 OBS = LESS THAN 1 pages
CHANGE THIS SYSTEM FOR AMELIORATE MO.
HELP US FOR IDENTIFICATION.

Created: 2012-01-13 09:34:02 CET (+0100)
Last modified: 2016-06-05 20:32:49 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 113 times, last viewed: 2016-11-16 22:35:26 CET (+0100)
Show Log