Observation 8704: Phaeophyscia Moberg
When: 2008-06-09
Herbarium specimen reported

Notes: I found this thing growing on what looks like a Phaeophyscia nigritella. It looks like a nonlichenized lichenicolous ascomycete.

Phaeophyscia nigritella: minute foliose lichen with green unicellular alga, smooth unmarked dark olive-brown upper surface, white corticate lower surface with abundant short white rhizines, and granular soredia in labriform soralia under upturned broad lobe-tips. All parts K- and C-.

(Later I did a section of the lower cortex and discovered that it was paraplectenchymatous, not prosoplectenchymatous, therefore it is Phaeophyscia, not Physciella as I originally thought.)

Parasite: clustered black biatorine apothecia; prominant smooth raised rim, colorless epihymenium and hymenium, brownish hypothecium, thick red-brown uniform exciple; asci cylindrical, K/I- to reddish, walls 1 µ thick throughout; spores 8 per ascus, hyaline, 1 cell, 1-2 bubbles, smooth, textured inside; paraphyses simple, mostly unbranched, smooth, not to somewhat thickening toward tips

There are very few lichenized fungi with apothecia that are K/I-. (Trapeliopsis and Placynthiella are two examples.) There are almost no macrolichens with biatorine (or lecideine) apothecia. (Coccocarpia is one.) This is clearly none of the above. The only thing that makes sense is that the apothecia belong to an unlichenized parasitic species on a lichen. Coincidence of soralia and apothecia on the same thallus is not necessarily unusual, however finding apothecia only in one or two isolated dense clusters on one side of a single contiguous thallus is unusual.

(The golden lichen in the one photo is Xanthomendoza fallax, by the way.)

Species Lists

Images

16467
These images taken under dissecting scope at 30×.
16468
These images taken under dissecting scope at 30×.
16469
These images taken under dissecting scope at 30×.
16470
Apothecial section, mounted in water, at 100×.
16471
Taken at 1000x, one mounted in water, the other mounted in water, washed with KOH, flushed with water and finally stained with Lugol’s.
16472
Taken at 1000x, one mounted in water, the other mounted in water, washed with KOH, flushed with water and finally stained with Lugol’s.

Proposed Names

28% (1)
Eyes3
Used references: ob notes

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
This is going to be the type specimen
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2009-07-23 23:41:38 CEST (+0200)

Since this was the freshest material Paul had at his disposal, he designated this the type specimen when describing it (to be published later this year, I believe). It will be stored at the Arizona State University herbarium.

Undescribed genus
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2008-08-09 09:47:23 CEST (+0200)

Seems this species is well-known, but in an as-yet undescribed genus. Paul Diederich says: “It is confined to Phaeophyscia species, and I have seen material from Europe, the USA (Arizona and California), Mexico and Paraguay”. So I guess this isn’t getting a name anytime soon…

(Phaeophyscia is very closely related to Physciella, so I’m not sure if I just IDed the host incorrectly or Paul meant Phaeophyscia in the broad sense.)

Created: 2008-08-07 20:48:46 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2011-04-26 03:53:38 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 53 times, last viewed: 2016-09-22 15:13:51 CEST (+0200)
Show Log